Main Article Content
This article has been removed at the request of the author.
The research was a naturalistic, non randomised, evaluation of Transactional Analysis (TA) and Gestalt psychotherapies, Integrative Counselling Psychology and Person Centred counselling within the research clinic at Metanoia Institute in the UK. Standardised measures were used to assess treatment outcomes and working alliance. Adherence to the model was evaluated in clinical supervision. The outcomes demonstrated that clients who engaged in treatment made statistically significant improvements.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The work in this journal is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Barkham, M., Margison, F., Leach, C., Lucock, M., J., M.-C., & Evans, C. (2001). Service Profiling and Outcomes Benchmarking Using the CORE-OM: Toward Practice-Based Evidence in the Psychological Therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 184-196.
Beck, A. (1996). United States of America Patent No. 0154018392.
Bordin, E. S. (1979). The Generalizability of the Psychoanalytic Concept of the Working Alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, 16(3), 252-260.
CORE Information Management Systems Ltd. (2007). CORE Net. from http://www.coreims-online.co.uk:
Horvarth, A. O., & Bedi, R. P. (2002). The Alliance. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy Relationships That Work. Therapist Contributions and Responsiveness to Patients (pp. 37-69): Oxfrod University Press.
Horvath, A. O. (1986). Another Approach to Assess the Counselling Relationship:The Working Alliance. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association.
Horwath, A. O., Del Re, A. C., Fluckiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in Individual Psychotherapy. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy Relationships that Work. Evidence Based Responsiveness
(pp. 25-69). Oxford: University Press.
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J., Monahan, P. O., & Lowe, B. (2007). Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care: Prevalence, Impairment, Comorbidity, and Detection. Annals of Internal Medicine, 146(317-325).
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a Brief Depression Severity Measure. Journal of General and Internal Medicine, 16, 606-613.
Ogrodniczuc, J., Joyce, A., & Piper, W. (2005). Strategies for reducing patient-initiated premature termination of psychotherapy. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 13(2).
Reis, B., & Brown, L. (1999). Reducing psychotherapy dropouts: maximising perspective convergence in the psychotherapy dyad. Psychotherapy, 36(2).
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, R., Williams, J. B., & Lowe, B. (2006). A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 1092-1097.
van Rijn, B., Wild, C., & Moran, P. (2011). Evaluating the Outcomes of Transactional Analysis and Integrative Counselling Psychology within UK Primary Care Settings. International Journal of Transacational Analysis Research, 2(2), 34-43