KEYNOTE: Transactional Analysis Psychotherapy Research: Three Methods describing a TA Group Therapy

Main Article Content

Roland Johnsson

Abstract

The overall aim of the thesis was to enhance and revive the practical understanding of the active ingredients in Transactional Analysis Psychotherapy (TA) and to define and lay down elements of TA that make it a distinct and replicable method of treatment.


The thesis includes three empirical studies of a videotaped one-year long TA Group Therapy with 10 clients. Three different key areas of Transactional Analysis have been investigated with support of three different approaches.


The first study (Johnsson, 2011 a) was a diagnostic client assessment with TA Script Analysis made as a reliability study. The second study (Johnsson, 2011 b) dealt with identification of different components in TA psychotherapy method with the use of Discourse Analysis and the third study (Johnsson & Stenlund, 2010) investigated the Therapeutic Alliance with a psychodynamic approach, using the CCRT method (the CORE Conflictual Relationship method) by Luborsky & Crits-Christoph (1990, 1998) and the Plan – Diagnosis method by Weiss & Sampson (1986).


Study I: A script questionnaire and associated checklist developed by Ohlsson, Johnsson & Björk (1992) was used by the author and two professional colleagues to independently assess ten clients of a year-long transactional analysis therapy group conducted by the author. Ratings based on written responses at start of therapy were compared to ratings based on videotape interviews conducted by the author six years after termination of therapy. Moderately high inter-assessor reliability was found but intra-assessor reliability was low for the independent assessors; agreement increased for script components ‘primary injunction from father,’ ‘racket feeling’, ‘escape hatch’, ‘driver from father’ and ‘driver from mother’.


Study II: Operational definitions of categorisations by McNeel (1975) were developed and applied by the author and an independent assessor to complete discourse analysis of 72 hours of transactional analysis group therapy in the style of Goulding & Goulding (1976, 1979) conducted during 1984/85. Results showed that the therapist used an average of 42% of the discourse space and that the therapy did indeed contain TA components, with the two main categories being ‘Feeling Contact’ and ‘Contracts’, and with particular use of TA techniques of ‘talking to Parent projections’, ‘make feeling statement’, ‘mutual negotiation’ and ‘specificity/clarity’. Inter-rater reliability was 46.2% (Araujo & Born 1985), Cohen’s (1960) kappa coefficient shows a spread from slight to moderate agreement, and the Odds Ratio (Viera, 2008) is above 1.0 for most categories. One intervention, "mutual negotiation", with moderate reliability could be identified as “TA typical".


Study III: The study describes an investigation of the significance of the affective dimension of the therapeutic alliance (Bordin 1979), in a psychodynamic form of transactional analysis therapy after the style of “Redecision therapy” (Goulding & Goulding, 1979). We explored the client’s pattern of affective relationships by use of CCRT by Luborsky & Crits-Christoph (1990, 1998) and examined how the therapist responds to the client’s affective messages (“tests”) by use of the Plan-Diagnosis method (Weiss & Sampson, 1986). We found that “emotional” aspects play a more decisive role than has been envisioned in the TA redecision method and similar approaches of TA psychotherapy that emphasise contracts, tasks of therapy and a rational approach.

Article Details

How to Cite
Johnsson, R. (2020). KEYNOTE: Transactional Analysis Psychotherapy Research: Three Methods describing a TA Group Therapy. International Journal of Transactional Analysis Research & Practice, 4(1), 11-25. https://doi.org/10.29044/v4i1p11
Section
Articles

References

Araujo, R. & Born, D. G. (1985). Calculating percentage agreement correctly but writing its Formula Incorrectly, The Behaviour Analyst, 2 (8), 207–208.
Bader, E. (1976). Redecisions in family therapy: A study of change in an intensive family therapy workshop. Ph.D. dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology.
Barber, J.P., Crits-Christoph P., & Luborsky, L. (1990). A guide to the CCRT standard categories and their classification. I L. Luborsky & P. Crits-Christoph (Red.), Understanding transference. The core conflictual relationship theme method (pp. 37-49). New York: Basic Books.
Berne, E. (1972). What Do You Say After You Say Hello? New York: Grove Press.
Bucci, W. (2008). The role of bodily experience in emotional organization. I F. S. Anderson (Ed.), Bodies in Treatment: The Unspoken dimension (pp. 51-76). New York: Analytic Press.
Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16, 252 – 260.
Canestri, J. (2006). Psychoanalysis: From Practice to Theory. London: Wiley.
Cohen, J. A. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
Cornell, W. F. (2000). Transference, desire and vulnerability in body-centered psychotherapy. Energy & Character, 30(2), 29-37.
Cornell, W. F. (2008). Explorations in Transactional Analysis: The Meech Lake Papers Pleasanton, CA: TA Press.
Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 76, No. 5 pp. 378–382.
Forskningsetikkommittén (2002). Protokoll 104-2 från Forskningsetikkommittén på Lunds Universitets sammanträde 2002-03-20.(Protocol from the Research Ethical Committee at Lund University 2001-03-20)
Freud, S. (1912/1958) The dynamics of transference. I J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.) The standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud. (Vol. 12, ss, 99-108) London: Hogarth Press.
Gaston, L. (1990). The concept of the alliance and its role in psychotherapy: Theoretical and empirical considerations. Psychotherapy, 27, 143 – 153.
Goodstein, M. (1971). A comparison of Gestalt and Transactional Analysis therapies in marathons. Ph.D. dissertation, Illinois Institute of Technology.
Goulding, R. & Goulding, M. (1976). Injunctions, Decisions and Redecisions. Transactional Analysis Journal 6 (1), 41-48.
Goulding, R. & Goulding, M. (1979). Changing lives through Redecision Therapy. New York: Grove Press.
Greenson, R. R. (1965) The working alliance and the transference neurosis. Psychoanalysis Quarterly, 34, 155- 181.
Gustle, L-H et al. (2007). Blueprints in Sweden. Symptom load in Swedish adolescents in studies of Functional Family Therapy (FFT), Multisystemic Therapy (MST) and Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care (MTFC). Nordic journal of psychiatry.
Hargarden, H. & Sills, C. (2002). Transactional Analysis: a relational perspective. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.
Hewitt, G. (1995) Cycles of Psychotherapy. Transactional Analysis Journal 16(3), 200-207.
Holloway, W. (1973). Clinical Transactional Analysis with Use of Life Script Questionnaire, Medina: Midwest Institute for Human Understanding.
Horvath, A.O., & Bedi, R.P. (2002). The alliance. In J.C. Norcross (ed). Psychotherapy Relationships that Work. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 37-69.
Holloway, W. (1973). Shut the Escape Hatch, no IV. The monograph series of Midwest Institute for Human Understanding no I-X. Medina: Midwest Institute for Human Understanding.
Holmqvist, R, (2006). Psykologi och placebo. (Psychology and placebo) Pskologtidningen, nr 10, 2006.
Hägglöf, B. (2009). Diagnostiska perspektiv inom Barn och ungdomspsykiatri: Nosologiskt
perspektiv. Föreläsning Barn och ungdomspsykiatri, Umeå universitet. (Diagnostic perspectives in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: Nosological perspective. Lecture Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Umeå University).
International Transactional Analysis Association (2011). Training and Exam Handbook section 7, Retrieved August 15, 2011, from http/www.itaa-net.org.
Johnsson, R. (2011). Transactional Analysis Psychotherapy – Three Methods Describing a Transactional Analysis Group Therapy, Department of Psychology, Lund University, ISBN 978-91-7473-185-9
Johnsson, R. (2011 a). Transactional analysis as psychotherapy method: A discourse analytic study. Retrieved from www.ijtar.org/article/view/9111
Johnsson, R. (2011 b). Client Assessment in Transactional Analysis – A Study of the Reliability and Validity of the Ohlsson, Björk and Johnsson Script Questionnaire. International Journal for Transactional Analysis Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, July 2011. Retrieved from http://www.ijtar.org/article/view/8943
Johnsson, R. & Ohlsson, T. (1974). Två olika sätt att se på psykiska problem. (Two different ways to look at psychological problems). Arbetet, p.5.
Johnsson, R. & Ohlsson, T. (1977). Att ta ansvar för sig själv – och svara an på andra: ”Ansvarsmodellen” i humanistisk psykologi och psykoterapi, (To be responsible for yourself – and respond to others “The Responsibility Model” in humanistic psychology and psychotherapy), Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand.
Johnsson, R., & Stenlund, G. (2010). The affective dimension of alliance in transactional analysis psychotherapy. International Journal for Transactional Analysis Research, 1(1). Retrieved from www.ijtar.org/article/view/6144
Kvale, S. (1987). Validity in the Qualitative Research Interview. Methods, vol. 1, No. 2.
Lambert, M. J. & Barley, D. E. (2002): Research Summary on the Therapeutic Relationship and Psychotherapy Outcome. I: Psychotherapy Relationships That Work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients. New York: Oxford University Press. (pp. 17-28).
Lambert M. J. & Ogles B. M. (2004). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. I: Lambert MJ (Ed.) Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change. 5th Ed. New York, Wiley, p. 139-93.
Landis, J.R. & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159–174.
Luborsky, L. (1976). Helping alliances in psychotherapy. In J. L. Cleghorn (Ed.), Successful psychotherapy (pp.92 – 116). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Luborsky, L., Rosenthal, R., Diguer, L., Andrusyana, T. P., Berman, J. S., Levitt, J. T., et al. (2002). The dodo bird verdict is alive and well mostly. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(1), 2-12.
Luborsky, L., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1990). Understanding Transference: The CORE Conflictual Relationship Theme Method. New York: Basic Books.
Luborsky L, & Crits-Christoph P. (1998). Understanding Transference: The CORE Conflictual Relationship Theme Method, (2nd ed.) Washington, DC, American Psychological Association.
Luborsky, L., Diguer, L., Seligman, D. A., Rosenthal, R., Johnson, S., Halperin, G., Bishop, M., & Schweizer, E. (1999). The researchers own therapeutic allegiances – A “wild card” in comparisons of treatment efficacy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6132.Psychotherapy part I), Psykologtidningen, nr 6, 19-22.
Luborsky, L., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1990). Understanding Transference: The CORE Conflictual Relationship Theme Method. New York: Basic Books.
Lundh, L-G. (2006). Metaperspektiv på Psykoterapin del II. (Meta-perspective on Psychotherapy part II), Psykologtidningen, nr 7, 19-22.
Malterud K. (1998). Validitet. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
McCormick, P. (1971). Guide for Use Of Life Script Questionnaire in Transactional Analysis, Berkeley: Transactional Pubs.
McNeel, J. R. (1975). A study of the effects of an intensive weekend group workshop. Ph.D. dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology.
McNeel, J. R. (1977) The Seven Components of Redecision Therapy. In Barnes, G. (ed.) Transactional Analysis after Eric Berne-Teaching and Practices of Three Schools. (pp. 425-440). New York: Harper´s College Press.
Novellino, M. (1984). Self-analysis of counter-transference. Transactional Analysis Journal, 14(1) 63-75.
Norcross, J. C. (2002). Empirically supported therapy relationships. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.),
Psychotherapy Relationships that Work: Therapist Contributions and Responsiveness to Patients (ss. 3-16). New York: Oxford University Press.
Norcross, J. C. & Lambert, M. J. (2011) Evidence-based therapy relationships. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy Relationships that Work: Therapist Contributions and Responsiveness to Patients, 2nd edition (ss. 3-21). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ohlsson, T. (2001). TA i missbruksarbete - Transaktionsanalytisk psykoterapi som behandlingsmetod för drogmissbrukare i miljöterapeutisk vård.(TA in Drug Abuse Work -Transactional Analysis Psychotherapy as a Treatment Method for Drug Addicts in Therapeutic Communities), Department of Clinical Psychology, Lund University.
Ohlsson, T. (2002). Effects of transactional analysis psychotherapy in therapeutic community treatment of drug addicts. Transactional Analysis Journal 32,153-177.
Ohlsson, T., Björk, A. & Johnsson, R. (1992). Transaktionsanalytisk psykoterapi – TA i teori och praktik. (Transactional Analysis Psychotherapy – TA in Theory and Practice) Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Paul, S. & Haugh, S. (2008): The therapeutic relationship: Perspectives and themes. UK: PCCS BOOKS ltd.
PDM Task Force. (2006). Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual. Silver Spring, MD: Alliance of Psychoanalytic Organizations.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences. Albany: SUNY Press.
Prochaska, J. O., Norcross, J. C. (2010) Systems of Psychotherapy – A Transtheoretical Analysis (7th edition) Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks & Cole.
Rønnestad, M. H. (2006). The International Study of the Development of Psychotherapists: Implications for Supervision. Presentation, Society for Psychotherapy Research, Annual International Meeting, Edinburgh, Scotland, 21.06.2006.
Sandell, R. (2004). Teknik eller relation? Om verksamma faktorer i psykoterapi. (Techniques or Relations? About effective factors in psychotherapy), Läkartidningen, 101, 1418-1422.
Sandell, R. (2009). Den terapeutiska relationen– faktisk interaktion eller inre representation. (The therapeutic relation – real interaction or inner representation), Psykologtidningen, nr 9, 12-16.
Shadish, W., Cook, T., and Campbell, D. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Shaskan, D., Moran, W., Moran, O. M. (1981). Influence of group psychotherapy: A thirty year follow-up. Transactional Analysis Journal 11, 270-274.
Shaskan, D., Moran, W. (1986). Influence of group psychotherapy: A thirty-eight year follow-up. Transactional Analysis Journal 16, 137-138.
Shostrom, E. L. (1964) An inventory for the measurement of self-actualization. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 24, 207-218.
Steiner, C. (1966). Script and Counterscript, Transactional Analysis Bulletin 5 (18), 133-135.
Steiner, C. (1967). A Script Checklist, Transactional Analysis Bulletin 6 (22), 38-39.
Steiner, C. (1971) Games Alcoholics Play. New York: Ballentine Books.
Steiner, C. (1974). Scripts people live: transactional analysis of life scripts. New York: Grove
Press.
Steiner, C. (1976). Script: Introduction. In Steiner, C. (Ed.) Beyond Games and Scripts by Eric Berne-Selections from his major writings. New York: Grove Press.
Sterba, R. F. (1934) The fate of the ego in analytic therapy. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 115, 117- 126.
Stewart, I. & Joines, V. (2002). Personality Adaptations: A New Guide to Human Understanding in Psychotherapy and Counselling. Nottingham: Lifespace Publishing.
ungdomar med alvarliga beteendeproblem. (Multisystemic therapy for young people with devastating behavioural problems), Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen. ISBN/ISSN: 91-85482-56-0.
Tomkins, S.S. (1962). Affect/Imagery/ Consciousness. Vol. 1: The positive affects. New York: Springer.
Tomkins, S.S. (1963). Affect/Imagery/ Consciousness. Vol. 2: The negative affects. New York: Springer.
Tomkins, S.S. (1991). Affect/Imagery/ Consciousness. Vol. 3: The negative affects: anger and fear. New York: Springer.
Tomkins, S. S. (1992). Affect imagery consciousness: Vol. IV. Cognition: Duplication and transformation of information. New York: Springer.
Tomkins, S.S. (1995 a). The quest for primary motives. I E. V. Demos, (red) Exploring Affect. The selected writings of Silvan S. Tomkins. (pp.27-63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tomkins, S.S. (1995 b). Role of the specific affects. I E. V. Demos, (red) Exploring Affect. The selected writings of Silvan S. Tomkins. (pp. 68-85). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tomkins, S.S. (1978). Script Theory: Differential magnification of Affects, I: Nebraska symposium on motivation (1979) (pp.201-233). Lincoln University of Nebraska Press.
Viera A. J. (2008). Odds Ratios and Risk Ratios: What's the difference and why does it matter?” South. Med. J. 101 (7): 730–4.
Wampold, B. E. (2001). The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models, Methods, and Findings. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wampold, B. E. (2002). An examination of the bases of evidence-based interventions. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 500-507.
Weiss, J., Sampson, H., & the Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group. (1986). The Psychoanalytic Process. Theory, Clinical Observations, and Empirical Research. New York: Guilford Press.
Viera A. J. (2008). Odds ratios and risk ratios: what's the difference and why does it matter? Southern Medical Journal, 101 (7), 730–4.
Widdowson, M. (2010). Transactional Analysis: 100 Key Points. Routledge, London.
Woollams, S. & Brown, M. (1978). Transactional Analysis. Dexter: Huron Valley Press.