Main Article Content
This article was previously published in the European Research Studies Journal, Volume XXIV, Issue 3B, 72-95, 2021, and we acknowledge with thanks the permission given by that journal to reproduce it here due to its TA content.
Like IJTARP, the ESJR is a refereed open access publication. It covers a wide variety of topics in the fields of business and economics, and can be accessed at www.ersj.eu.
We have used minimal editing, which has included formatting and English spelling.
Purpose: The purpose of the article is to present the research results based on the concept of passivity in accordance with the assumptions of transactional analysis – one of the psychotherapeutic modalities in the humanistic school of thought. Passivity is defined as behaviors that block constructive and solution-oriented actions.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The main research methods included diagnostic surveys and questionnaire techniques. The study used the “Reality of an Educator” questionnaire by Anna Pierzchała (2013). 441 respondents provided their answers from Guatemala, Poland, the UK and Ukraine. The differences were identified using the Kruskal–Wallis test, the equivalent of a one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) that is commonly used for independent samples.
Findings: The comparative cross-cultural research on teacher passive behaviours indicated significant educational differences between countries. The lowest levels of passivity were reported in Guatemala  and the highest in Ukraine. The Hofstede Model of Cultural Dimensions enabled the authors to outline some generic tendencies concerning passive behaviours in the countries studied. Individually reported levels of passivity were bridged with cultural determinants resulting from teachers’ social functioning.
Practical Implications: The study offers some guidelines for tackling teacher passivity and identifies strategies of enhancing problem-solving skills. The most common passive behaviour across all countries was overadaptation, which underlined the importance of developing teachers’ awareness of interpersonal phenomena from the point of view of transactional analysis.
Originality/Value: The research presented has not been carried out before and at this stage has an exploratory character, indicating certain inter-culturally declared patterns and at the same time determining areas for further investigation. Transactional analysis appears to be a useful theoretical construct in the design of cross-cultural comparative studies.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The work in this journal is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Berne, E. (1963). The Structure and Dynamics of Organizations and Groups. Grove Press.
Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J. (2006). Reprodukcja. Elementy teorii systemu nauczania [Reproduction. Elements of the Learning System Theory]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Burton, M., Moore, C., Whiting, J. Romney, K. (1996). Regions Based on Social Structure. Current Anthropology, 37(1), 87-123. https://doi.org./10.1086/204474
Ember, C. R., Ember, M. (2009). Cross-cultural Research Methods (Second Edition). AltaMira Press.
Goffman, E. (2008). Człowiek w teatrze życia codziennego [The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life]. Wydawnictwo Aletheia.
Heinrich, W. F., Green, P. M. (2020). Remixing Approaches to Experiential Learning, Design, and Assessment. Journal of Experiential Education, 43(2), 205-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825920915608
Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(3), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(86)90015-5
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
Jagieła, J. (2004). Gry psychologiczne w szkole [Psychological Games In School]. Oficyna Wydawnicza Nauczycieli.
James, N. L. (1994). Cultural Frame of Reference and Intergroup Encounters: A TA Approach. Transactional Analysis Journal, 24(3), 206-210.
Łęski, Z. (1997). Osobowość nauczyciela w świetle analizy transakcyjnej [Teacher personality in the light of transactional analysis]. In J. Jagieła (ed.). Analiza transakcyjna w teorii i praktyce pedagogicznej [Transactional analysis in pedagogical theory and practice] (123-135). JDU Publishing House.
Mellor, K., Schiff, E. (1975a). Discounting. Transactional Analysis Journal, 5(3), 295-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215377500500321
Mellor, K., Schiff, E. (1975b). Redefining. Transactional Analysis Journal, 5(3), 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215377500500322
Pierzchała, A. (2010). Pasywność według teorii Analizy Transakcyjnej jako efekt negowania podmiotowości w relacji nauczyciel-uczeń [Passivity according to the theory of Transactional Analysis as a result of negating subjectivity in the teacher-student relationship]. In A. Gofron, B. Łukasik (eds.). Podstawy edukacji. Podmiot w dyskursie pedagogicznym: Tom 3 [Basics of education. Subject in Pedagogical Discourse: Volume 3] (pp.309-323). Impuls Publisher.
Pierzchała, A. (2013). Pasywność w szkole. Diagnoza zjawiska z punktu widzenia analizy transakcyjnej [Passivity at school. Diagnosis of the phenomenon from the point of view of transactional analysis]. JDU Publishing House.
Robinson, K., Aronica, L. (2009). The element: how finding your passion changes everything. Penguin Group USA.
Romney, K., Moore, C. (1998). Toward a Theory of Culture as Shared Cognitive Structures. Ethos, 26(3), 314-337. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.19188.8.131.524
Schiff, A. W., Schiff, J. L. (1971). Passivity. Transactional Analysis Journal, 1(1), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215377100100114
Schiff, J. L. (1975). Cathexis reader. Harper & Row Publisher, Inc.
Schiff, J. L., Schiff, A., Schiff, E. (1975). Frames of Reference. Transactional Analysis Journal, 5(3), 290-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215377500500320
Segall, M., Lonner, W., Berry, J. (1998). Cross-Cultural Psychology as a Scholarly Discipline: On the Flowering of Culture in Behavioral Research. American Psychologist, 53, 1101-1110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.10.1101
Shafiro, M. V., Himelein, M., Best, D. (2003). Ukrainian and US American Females - Differences in Individualism/Collectivism and Gender Attitudes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 297-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022103034003004
Stewart, I., Joines, V. (2009). TA Today. A New Introduction to Transactional Analysis. Lifespace Publishing.
Ting-Toomey, S., Kurogi, A. (1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(2), 187-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00004-2
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Westview Press.
UNICEF. (2019). Every Child Learns. UNICEF Education Strategy 2019-2030. United Nations Children’s Fund. https://www.unicef.org/media/59856/file/UNICEF-education-strategy-2019-2030.pdf
United Nations Human Development Reports. (2018). Human Development Index (HDI). United Nations Development Programme. https://hdr.undp.org/
Widawska, E. (2016a). Ku czemu wychowywać ma szkoła? Refleksja w oparciu o model analizy transakcyjnej [What is the school to educate for? Reflection based on the transactional analysis model]. Edukacyjna Analiza Transakcyjna, 5, 93-109. https://doi.org/10.16926/eat.2016.05.06
Widawska, E. (2016b). The importance of soft skills for the efficiency of pedagogical work in the context of transactional analysis. In E. Rangielova et al (eds.). Теория и практика на психолого-педагогическата подготовка на специалиста в университета (672-679). ‘EKS-PRESS’ OOD Publisher.