Cross-cultural Study of Teacher Passivity through the Lens of Educational Transactional Analysis

Main Article Content

Anna Pierzchała
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9529-5398
Edyta Widawska
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0964-0341
Piotr Jusik
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5824-9966

Abstract

This article was previously published in the European Research Studies Journal, Volume XXIV, Issue 3B, 72-95, 2021, and we acknowledge with thanks the permission given by that journal to reproduce it here due to its TA content.


Like IJTARP, the ESJR is a refereed open access publication. It covers a wide variety of topics in the fields of business and economics, and can be accessed at www.ersj.eu.


We have used minimal editing, which has included formatting and English spelling.


Purpose: The purpose of the article is to present the research results based on the concept of passivity in accordance with the assumptions of transactional analysis – one of the psychotherapeutic modalities in the humanistic school of thought. Passivity is defined as behaviors that block constructive and solution-oriented actions.


Design/Methodology/Approach: The main research methods included diagnostic surveys and questionnaire techniques. The study used the “Reality of an Educator” questionnaire by Anna Pierzchała (2013). 441 respondents provided their answers from Guatemala, Poland, the UK and Ukraine. The differences were identified using the Kruskal–Wallis test, the equivalent of a one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) that is commonly used for independent samples.


Findings: The comparative cross-cultural research on teacher passive behaviours indicated significant educational differences between countries. The lowest levels of passivity were reported in Guatemala [1] and the highest in Ukraine. The Hofstede Model of Cultural Dimensions enabled the authors to outline some generic tendencies concerning passive behaviours in the countries studied. Individually reported levels of passivity were bridged with cultural determinants resulting from teachers’ social functioning.


Practical Implications: The study offers some guidelines for tackling teacher passivity and identifies strategies of enhancing problem-solving skills. The most common passive behaviour across all countries was overadaptation, which underlined the importance of developing teachers’ awareness of interpersonal phenomena from the point of view of transactional analysis.


Originality/Value: The research presented has not been carried out before and at this stage has an exploratory character, indicating certain inter-culturally declared patterns and at the same time determining areas for further investigation. Transactional analysis appears to be a useful theoretical construct in the design of cross-cultural comparative studies.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pierzchała, A., Widawska, E., & Jusik, P. (2022). Cross-cultural Study of Teacher Passivity through the Lens of Educational Transactional Analysis. International Journal of Transactional Analysis Research & Practice, 13(1), 28-52. https://doi.org/10.29044/v13i1p28
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Anna Pierzchała, Jan Dlugosz University, Czestochowa, Poland

Anna Pierzchała PhD is a Reader at Jan Dlugosz University, Czestochowa, Poland and author of several TA-based articles, ORCID: 0000-0001-9529-5398. She can be contacted at a.pierzchala@ujd.edu.pl

Edyta Widawska, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland

Edyta Widawska PhD is a Professor at University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland, specialises in human rights and is author of several TA-based articles. ORCID: 0000-0002-0964-0341. She can be contacted at edyta.widawska@us.edu.pl

Piotr Jusik, IFLOWCOACHING Consultancy and the Centro de Investigacion Cientifica y Cultural

Piotr Jusik MSc is a Certified Transactional Analyst (Counselling), MBACP (Accred) and has an ILM 7 Diploma in Leadership & Executive Coaching. He is based in Guatemala and leads IFLOWCOACHING Consultancy and the Centro de Investigacion Cientifica y Cultural. ORCID: 0000-0001-5824-9966. He can be contacted at peter@iflowcoaching.com

References

Barrow, G., Bradshaw, E., Newton, T. (2001). Improving Behaviour and Raising Self-Esteem in the Classroom. A Practical Guide to Using Transactional Analysis. David Fulton Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203445365

Berne, E. (1963). The Structure and Dynamics of Organizations and Groups. Grove Press.

Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J. (2006). Reprodukcja. Elementy teorii systemu nauczania [Reproduction. Elements of the Learning System Theory]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Burton, M., Moore, C., Whiting, J. Romney, K. (1996). Regions Based on Social Structure. Current Anthropology, 37(1), 87-123. https://doi.org./10.1086/204474
Ember, C. R., Ember, M. (2009). Cross-cultural Research Methods (Second Edition). AltaMira Press.

Goffman, E. (2008). Człowiek w teatrze życia codziennego [The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life]. Wydawnictwo Aletheia.

Heinrich, W. F., Green, P. M. (2020). Remixing Approaches to Experiential Learning, Design, and Assessment. Journal of Experiential Education, 43(2), 205-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825920915608

Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(3), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(86)90015-5

Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014

Jagieła, J. (2004). Gry psychologiczne w szkole [Psychological Games In School]. Oficyna Wydawnicza Nauczycieli.

James, N. L. (1994). Cultural Frame of Reference and Intergroup Encounters: A TA Approach. Transactional Analysis Journal, 24(3), 206-210.
https://doi.org//10.1177/036215379402400308

Łęski, Z. (1997). Osobowość nauczyciela w świetle analizy transakcyjnej [Teacher personality in the light of transactional analysis]. In J. Jagieła (ed.). Analiza transakcyjna w teorii i praktyce pedagogicznej [Transactional analysis in pedagogical theory and practice] (123-135). JDU Publishing House.

Mellor, K., Schiff, E. (1975a). Discounting. Transactional Analysis Journal, 5(3), 295-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215377500500321

Mellor, K., Schiff, E. (1975b). Redefining. Transactional Analysis Journal, 5(3), 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215377500500322

Pierzchała, A. (2010). Pasywność według teorii Analizy Transakcyjnej jako efekt negowania podmiotowości w relacji nauczyciel-uczeń [Passivity according to the theory of Transactional Analysis as a result of negating subjectivity in the teacher-student relationship]. In A. Gofron, B. Łukasik (eds.). Podstawy edukacji. Podmiot w dyskursie pedagogicznym: Tom 3 [Basics of education. Subject in Pedagogical Discourse: Volume 3] (pp.309-323). Impuls Publisher.

Pierzchała, A. (2013). Pasywność w szkole. Diagnoza zjawiska z punktu widzenia analizy transakcyjnej [Passivity at school. Diagnosis of the phenomenon from the point of view of transactional analysis]. JDU Publishing House.

Robinson, K., Aronica, L. (2009). The element: how finding your passion changes everything. Penguin Group USA.

Romney, K., Moore, C. (1998). Toward a Theory of Culture as Shared Cognitive Structures. Ethos, 26(3), 314-337. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1998.26.3.314

Schiff, A. W., Schiff, J. L. (1971). Passivity. Transactional Analysis Journal, 1(1), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215377100100114

Schiff, J. L. (1975). Cathexis reader. Harper & Row Publisher, Inc.

Schiff, J. L., Schiff, A., Schiff, E. (1975). Frames of Reference. Transactional Analysis Journal, 5(3), 290-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215377500500320

Segall, M., Lonner, W., Berry, J. (1998). Cross-Cultural Psychology as a Scholarly Discipline: On the Flowering of Culture in Behavioral Research. American Psychologist, 53, 1101-1110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.10.1101

Shafiro, M. V., Himelein, M., Best, D. (2003). Ukrainian and US American Females - Differences in Individualism/Collectivism and Gender Attitudes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 297-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022103034003004

Stewart, I., Joines, V. (2009). TA Today. A New Introduction to Transactional Analysis. Lifespace Publishing.

Ting-Toomey, S., Kurogi, A. (1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(2), 187-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00004-2

Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Westview Press.

UNICEF. (2019). Every Child Learns. UNICEF Education Strategy 2019-2030. United Nations Children’s Fund. https://www.unicef.org/media/59856/file/UNICEF-education-strategy-2019-2030.pdf

United Nations Human Development Reports. (2018). Human Development Index (HDI). United Nations Development Programme. https://hdr.undp.org/

Widawska, E. (2016a). Ku czemu wychowywać ma szkoła? Refleksja w oparciu o model analizy transakcyjnej [What is the school to educate for? Reflection based on the transactional analysis model]. Edukacyjna Analiza Transakcyjna, 5, 93-109. https://doi.org/10.16926/eat.2016.05.06

Widawska, E. (2016b). The importance of soft skills for the efficiency of pedagogical work in the context of transactional analysis. In E. Rangielova et al (eds.). Теория и практика на психолого-педагогическата подготовка на специалиста в университета (672-679). ‘EKS-PRESS’ OOD Publisher.